Daily Archives: July 20, 2008

Nuclear Attack Communications

While I was active duty Navy, I was involved in a lot of strategic communication studies that involved researching and computer modeling to find ways to guarantee reliable communications under all circumstances – including things like the worst possible weather, earthquakes, terrorists and nuclear attack. We called it Communications Continuity.  The objective is to have assured communications in the trans and post attack phase of a nuclear war or other crisis.  That means that you cannot rely on any fixed installation since it will be bombed in the opening salvo.  Likewise all of the satellites and fixed communications centers, including phone and computer lines and all of the major nodes on the internet will be destroyed.Despite all this, there are entire networks that are designed to survive and work even after a major attack.  The one that is most reliable is to use is low frequency radio waves in the ELF range.  Extremely Low Frequency.  Way below the AM broadcast band.  These frequencies have two very good characteristics:  They will punch thru the static and noise created by atom bomb blasts and they will penetrate into the water to reach submerged submarines.  Unfortunately, they also have two bad characteristics.  To make use of ELF effectively, you need a BIG antenna to receive and transmit and you need a whole bunch of power – like in the multiple megawatt range.To receive ELF, subs use a trailing wire antenna that can drag behind the submerged sub by more than a mile, if needed.  Aircraft (like SAC bombers) have drop-down wires that can reach out 18,000 feet to snag an ELF signal.  Since these guys mostly receive only, they do not need the power of a megawatt transmitter to respond to these signals.  But someone has to have that power and a really big antenna.  It’s there, right under your nose and you have probably seen it and did not know it.One of the backups to the backups that the military uses to send ELF messages is the power lines that normally deliver power to your homes and businesses.  By cutting these wires at two ends and making some other minor changes, they can turn a stretch of highway telephone pole power wires into a very long ELF antenna.  This allows them to not have to use tuning systems to try to pump out all that power into a ¼ wavelength antenna or shorter, less efficient antenna.The power comes from two 18 wheeler trucks.  One has fuel and a small command post and the other is one huge generator – capable of creating about 20 megawatts of electrical power.  A third vehicle is usually an RV with the crew quarters and other support.  These three vehicles travel in teams around the US – constantly in motion – driving along routes that have been surveyed to make ideal ELF antennas.  They are all disguised as normal 18 wheelers and have all the fake papers to let them move among all the other truckers on the road.At last count, there are 24 of these teams covering an area of 350, 000 square miles from Alaska to Florida and all of Canada.  They never stop.  There are dozens of crews that are rotated out every 45 days at special bases where they can get equipment spares and run testsNext time you have a totally unexplained power outage, look for two 18 wheelers and an RV traveling together or near each other.  You might have just witnessed a test of the emergency communications network.Think this is far fetched.  Consider this.  Each military and intelligence service has an office dedicated to this subject as well as several entire organizations (DIA, DISA, DSS, NRO, NSA, CSC, etc.)but the overall office with DoD is the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Communications, Command, Control and Intelligence (ASD-C3I). There is also a new office called the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Networks and Information Integration (ASD-NII).

About the Author!

My name is not important but it is an unfortunate fact of human nature to associate the credibility of ideas with the person that has them.  This usually serves us well in helping us screen good and bad information and to add doubt where it may be needed.  I cannot fault that logic, however, it has also led to a high level of resistance to new or innovative ideas over the course of history.  That resistance has resulted in delays of years or decades from the initial discovery by some obscure scientist or thinker and the general recognition of the value of their idea.  It is unfortunate that nearly every great idea in science dates back to just such a humble beginning.     

My career began when I got drafted into the Navy after spending three years at the Georgia Institute of Technology.  I had done well but I screwed up during a summer session and lost my “S” deferment.  After three years of nearly non-stop technical schools in the Navy, I qualified for the Navy Enlisted Scientific Education Program (NESEP) and they sent me to the University of New Mexico.  Between my GA. Tech, Navy and correspondence courses, I was given more than 280 credit hours toward various degrees but had to take additional courses to get any of them.  By carefully playing a game of class shuffle, I managed to stay at UNM for three years and left with four degrees – Math, Computer Science, Physics and Engineering.  Of course the Navy knew only about the last one.     

I did a lot of special sponsored courses in computer modeling of various energy projects and made a few findings that my professors took credit for.  I designed the currently used aircraft anti-collision system, I modeled a method of terrain mapping for navigation, I computed the ideal energy-conservation designs for numerous building materials – double and triple paned windows, wall insulation designs, injection foam, etc. and about 40 other similar projects.   

When I left, I was promoted to Lt. USN and told I could go to sea or go to the Navy’s Post Graduate School at Monterey, Calif.  Of course I went to PG school.  38 months later, I left with a Master’s in Operations Research and a PhD in simulation and modeling (dynamic systems and game theory).  I would have been out earlier but my thesis, which was classified (and still is), was one that they wanted me to complete.  It must have been liked because it got me a job at NRL and I wound up moving about 10 miles away.  I got a place right at the end of the airport runway (ug- what a lot of noise) but it was also right near the new golf course.    

I worked there for a few years on some modeling of weather but thought it was very limiting so I accepted an offer from a friend to move over to DARPA.  Here I was allowed to work in a number of areas on my own or on target projects.  I worked on C3I automation, simulation of various communications issues, autonomous weapons systems, robotics and artificial intelligence.  I was eventually given free reign to work on any pet project I had.  That was fun and I worked there for many years or it seemed like it.    So you see, I spent a lifetime in science and research – most of it in the military or as a government worker or contractor.  I often had the advantage of a virtually unlimited budget and very wide latitude on the range of my studies.  But my contribution was always taken for granted.  I was a paid employee and was named only as part of the “project team” or grouped as “contributors”.  This was true even when I worked on the project alone or was the principal investigator or design lead. 

Not getting credit for some design or device or mathematical analysis, especially when it was classified, was never a problem for me until I realized that being unknown meant that I was never peer reviewed for anything and therefore had little or no standing or credibility in the real world scientific community.   In some very closed and classified circles, I am known to have solved problems, refined designs and resolved problems but most of that will never be known by anyone outside of that closed group and, for the most part, they don’t care.   

I had always looked forward to the day that I could have stimulating dialog with fellow scientists about some of the great unknowns but I have found that happens only when the people you are talking to, think of you as being a “fellow scientists”.  If they don’t, then they dismiss your views as not having been vetted or having any credibility.  Attempts to break that wall have proved useless and I am never taken more seriously than the neighborhood high school science teacher.    My work was well received by DoD and I advanced in rank fairly fast with two deep selections one to Cdr.  That means I was promoted earlier than others of my year group.  In 1995, I was deep selected for Captain but told I had to stay in 3 more years to retire at that rank.  I spent 45 days leave mulling over that decision but finally decided to stay and get the extra retirement pay.  In those last three years, I made a lot of industry contacts since I was the PM for several acquisition hush-hush programs.  When I retired in 1998, I got a bunch of medals and commendations that, with a $1.00 would get me a cup of coffee.      

I did not work for others at first but instead began working at home on an investment analysis and prediction modeling program.  It is based on analysis of past patterns but it looks for a preselected level of confidence in the prediction of the future events.  I decided to use it to examine the whole Y2K event and even put up a web site called Profit2000.  Among the other predictions, which are no great feat, my program predicted the rise and fall of the price of gold.  I took my own advice and took out short options on gold before Dec 1999 and put options after and made a bundle.  I sold the predictive software to a Wall Street consulting firm that is still using it but they made me promise not to tell anyone.  They prefer to let everyone think they are brainy experts rather than telling everyone that their investment advice is simply a computer program.I got tired of that and started my own business modeling consulting agency. 

I created some unique computer modeling tools for virtual product development (VPD) and business risk assessments.  One of them is a neural-net BPR/ABC model that uses Monte Carlo analysis of critical variables to do a stochastic analysis of process flow and work flow.  This model automatically creates an optimum business process flow for a business.  I sold the company and several large government contracts I had won and finally really retired in 2005.     

I then moved to the mountains near New Denver, BC, CA.  Here I have built my dream house and am still adding on to it.  Most of the house is actually a cave that I expanded and fixed up but I have several berm and Earthship style outbuildings that blend in with the surroundings with living plants on most of the roofs.  With the abundant lake water to add to my wells and rain/snow melt water, I can afford to use a lot of water to feed plants inside and out.   I wanted to make use of some of my ideas on energy and building but I also did not want copycats or tourists coming to see what I have done.  From more than 100 feet away, it is hard to see most of my buildings and I have about 30,000 square feet of enclosed space.  I like that.    

I use geothermal heat pumps of my own design to do most of the heating and cooling – including keeping the snow off my walkways and driveways.  I use solar PVs to power most everything with some assist from a micro-hydro generator and a small 3 KW wind generator.  I also have my own designed solar thermal heater that gives me heat on any day with sunshine.  I cook up my own vehicle fuel and fly my own aircraft off the lake and dabble in some unique ultra-light designs.  One is an inflatable pontoon two-seater and the other is an ultra-light helo.  I have a huge barn in which I usually have dozens of science experiments going and a bank of top end PCs in a wireless network that blankets my entire property.  I use a yagi for satcomm and a parabolic to send a millimeter wave to cross the lake to link into the landline phones and a backup data link.    

All this gives me nearly total off-grid capability while also being able to keep in contact with anyone and anywhere.  My property is not easily accessible except by the lake and I have that well monitored and protected.  I like the isolation but I also have a place in Vermont and like traveling back and forth between these two retreats at different times of the year.  This may sound like I am a hermit that has given up on people and there are times that I feel like that but I actually have visitors that come up and stay in one of my cabins for up to several weeks at a time.  I allow them to come and go as they please mostly because the nearest cabin is about 200 feet from my house and cave.  I have a few friends within the scientific community that I keep in touch with and with whom I enjoy exchanging ideas.  Most are former military co-workers but a few are from academia and active duty and government agencies.  I just don’t have time to try to play political or social games with people that can’t be honest and forthright.    

This web site is mostly my effort to shout at the moon and let off some of my frustration.  Some of the articles are just for fun, some are serious and some date back two decades to when I was trying to break out of my government cubical by joining Mensa and getting some articles published.    I thought I was being careful but, I ended up getting pounced on by my bosses because I was still doing classified work and I was not to draw attention to myself or my work.      

As far as how you take these articles – I don’t care.  They are either true or not.  They are either of interest to you or not.    It should be obvious that some of them were written in fun but I challenge you to figure out which ones as I have backed-up almost everything with sound scientific evidence or at least a scientific basis.  After 50 years of hard core research and scientific analysis, experience and effort, they are presented here for MY pleasure and you can take it or leave it.      

What I will tell you is that MOST of these articles and MOST of what is in each and every article is absolute fact and many are completely true!    Really!       Take it or leave it!! 

Clinton’s Dead Path

I did not write this nor create it but it shows how far our government has descended into the depths. 

The following is a list of dead people connected with Bill and Hillary Clinton:   James McDougal – Clinton’s convicted Whitewater partner died of an  apparent heart attack, while in solitary confinement. He was a key witnessin Ken Starr’s investigation.  A frail, sick, old man was put into solitary lockupwithout his heart attack medicene despite having a record of several previous attacks and a perscription for the medicene from the prison doctor.    Mary Mahoney – A former White House intern was murdered July 1997at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in Georgetown. The murder happened just after she wasto go public with her story of sexual harassment in the White House.    Vince Foster – Former white House councelor, and colleague ofHillery Clinton at Little Rock’s Rose law firm. Died of a gunshot wound to the head,ruled a suicide.    Ron Brown – Secretary of Commerce and former DNC Chairman.Reported to have died by impact in a plane crash. A pathologist close to the investigation  reported that there was a hole in the top of Brown’s skull resembling agunshot wound. At the time of his death Brown was being investigated, and spokepublicly of his willingness to cut a deal with prosecutors.    C. Victor Raiser II – & – Montgomery raiser Major players in theClinton fund raising organization died in a private plane crash in July 1992.    Paul Tulley – Democratic National Committee Political Director found  dead in a hotel room in Little Rock, September 1992. Described by Clinton asa ” Dear friend and trusted advisor”.    Ed Willey – Clinton fund raiser, found dead November 1993 deep inthe woods in Virginia of a gunshot wound to the head. Ruled a suicide. EdWilley died on the same day his wife Kathleen Willey claimed Bill Clinton groped herin the oval office in the White House. Ed Willey was involved in several Clinton  fund raising events.    Jerry Parks – Head of Clinton’s gubernatorial security team inLittle Rock.  Gunned down in his car at a deserted intersection outside LittleRock.  Park’s son said his father was building a dossier on Clinton. He allegedly  threatened to reveal this information. After he died the files weremysteriously removed from his house.    James Bunch – Died from a gunshot suicide. It was reported that hehad a “Black Book” of people containing names of influential people who visited  prostitutes in Texas and Arkansas.    James Wilson – Was found dead in May 1993 from an aparent hanging  suicide. He was reported to have ties to Whitewater.    Kathy Ferguson – Ex-wife of Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson diedin May 1994 was found dead in her living roon with a gunshot to her head. It wasruled a suicide even though there were several packed suitcases, as if she was going  someware. Danny Ferguson was a co-defendant along with Bill Clinton in thePaula Jones lawsuit. Kathy Ferguson was a possible corroborating witness forPaula Jones.    Bill Shelton – Arkansas state Trooper and fiancee of Kathy Ferguson.  Critical of the suicide ruling of his fiancee, he was found dead in June, 1994of a gunshot wound also ruled a suicide at the gravesite of his fiancee.    Gandy Baugh – Attorney for Clinton friend Dan Lassater died byjumping out a window of a tall building January, 1994. His client was aconvicted drug distributor.    Florence Martin – Accountant sub-contractor for the CIA related tothe Barry Seal Mena Airport drug smuggling case. Died of three gunshot wounds.    Suzanne Coleman – Reportedly had an affair with Clinton when he was  Arkansas Attorney General. Died of a gunshot wound to the back of the head,  ruled a suicide. Was pregnant at the time of her death.    Paula Grober – Clinton’s speech interpreter for the deaf from 1978until her death December 9, 1992. She died in a one car accident.    Danny Casolaro – Investigative reporter. Investigating MenaAirport and Arkansas Development Finance Authority. He slit his wrists, apparentsuicide in the middle of his investigation.    Paul Wilcher – Attorney investigating corruption at Mena Airportwith Casolaro and the 1980 “October Surprise” was found deadon a toilet June 22,1993 in his Washington DC apartment. Had delivered a report to Janet Reno 3weeks before his death.    Jon Parnell Walker – Whitewater investigator for Resolution TrustCorp.   Jumped to his death from his Arlington, Virginia apartment balcony August15, 1993 Was investigating Morgan Guarantee scandal.    Barbara Wise – Commerce Department staffer. Worked closely with Ron  Brown and John Huang. Cause of death unknown. Died November 29, 1996. Herbrused nude body was found locked in her office at the Department of Commerce.    Charles Meissner – Assistant Secretary of Commerce who gave JohnHuang special security clearance, died shortly thereafter in a small plane crash.    Dr. Stanley Heard – Chairman of the National Chiropractic HealthCare Advisory Committee died with his attorney Steve Dickson in a small planecrash. Dr. Heard, in addition to serving on Clinton’s advisory councilpersonally treated Clinton’s mother, stepfather and brother.    Barry Seal – Drug running pilot out of Mena Arkansas, Death was no  accident.    Johnny Lawhorn Jr. – Mechanic, found a check made out to Clintonin the trunk of a car left in his repair shop. Died when his car hit a utility pole.    Stanley Huggins – Suicide. Investigated Madison Guarantee. Hisreport was never released.    Hershell Friday – Attorney and Clinton fund raiser died March 1,1994 when his plane exploded.    Kevin Ives & Don Henry – Known as “The boys on the track” case.Reports say the boys may have stumbled upon the Mena arkansas airport drugoperation. Controversaial case whereinitial report of death was due to falling  asleep on railroad track. Later reports claim the 2 boys had been slain before  being placed on the tracks. Many linked to the case died before their  testimony could come before a Grand Jury.    THE FOLLOWING SIX PERSONS HAD INFORMATION ON THE IVES / HENRY CASE    Keith Coney – Died when his motorcycle slammed into the back of atruck July, 1988    Keith McMaskle – Died stabbed 113 times, Nov, 1988    Gregory Collins – Died from a gunshot wound January 1989.    Jeff Rhodes – He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trashdump in April 1989.    James Milan – Found decapitated. Coroner ruled death due to natural  causes.    Jordan Kettleson – Was found shot to death in the front seat of his  pickup truck in June 1990.    Richard Winters – Was a suspect in the Ives / Henry  deaths. Waskilled in a set-up robbery July 1989    THE FOLLOWING CLINTON BODYGUARDS ARE DEAD.  It has to be assumed that these body guards were not all frail old men.  They most often are fit, active types in good health.    Major William S. Barkley Jr.  Captain Scott J. Reynolds  Sgt. Brian Hanley  Sgt. Tim Sabel  Major General William Robertson  Col. William Densberger  Col. Robert Kelly  Spec. Gary Rhodes  Steve Willis  Robert Williams  Conway LeBleu  Todd McKeehan If you consider the 12 guards all died of natual causes, the totals are: 

Murdered – 15Accidents – 10Suicides – 11Natual – 13 There are only 49 people here but let us assume that this is from a large list of people that Clinton’s know of or had some contact with.  In order for these numbers to be statistically average for the US, the numbers of people it would have to represent is: Murdered –  For 15 to be average, the total sample group would have to be 690,000Accidents – For 10 to be average, the total sample group would have to be 2,500,000Suicides –   For 11 to be average, the total sample group would have to be 69,179 (see below)Natual –      For 13 to be average, the total sample group would have to be 3,172 (see below) (source is from the FBI Uniform Crime Reports) 

The “Black Arts Guide” describes the three methods most often used to hide a murder as being:  1.         private airplane crashes (7 of 10 accidents listed above); 2.         single car crashes (3 of 10 accidents listed above) and 3.         gunshot suicides (7 of 11 suicides listed above). Of the 11 sucides listed, 9 were under “unusual” circumstances or had unsolved aspects.    Of the 11 listed suicides, most were in the age group of 45-54.  For this group, the National Center for Health Statistics listed a national sucide rate of 1 in 6,289.  For 11 to be average, the total sample group would have to be 69,179. Of the 13 deaths by natural causes, 7 were under 50 years old and 2 were under 40.  Overall, there is a 1 in 119 chance of death in any given year from natual causes,however, this figure changes dramatically with age and location.  An age corrected risk for these 13 would be closer to 1 in 244 or  For 13 to be average, the total sample group would have to be 3,172. If Clinton will lie and then order a missle attack, killing hundreds, to divert attention away from his personal issues,  would he let the above listed people get in his way?  Apparently not…….

Dark Matter’s Dark Secret

We all know how Edwin Hubble made his measures of the movement of distant objects and concluded that the universe was expanding.  This caused researchers to wonder if we would expand forever (open), re-collapse (closed) or reach some future steady state (flat).   This also implied that we must have been smaller in the past and therefore the big bang theory was supported.  What did happen and what will happen depends on a lot on the average density of the universe and the exact rate of expansion. 

We are in the middle of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey to quantify these values in greater detail but we now know enough now to know that the visible matter in the universe is not enough to account for what we observe.  In fact, the “missing mass problem” has been around since 1933 and follows from the application of the virial theorem to galactic movements.

As science and math have done many times before, we speculate on a solution and then go looking for proof that that solution exists.  So we created the “dark matter component” and its counterpart – dark energy.  Since this is entirely an imaginary creation, we have given it properties that fit current observations – which is that it is entirely invisible, even though it makes up 96% of the universe.  It has no emissions or reflections of any electromagnetic radiation so we have no idea what it looks like. 

Despite supporting this imaginary construct, cosmologists and astronomers will admit that they cannot suggest what extrapolation of any known physics could account for something that is responsible for so much mass in the universe and yet cannot be detected by any normal observation.

Our only inference that it is there is from observed gravitational effects on visible matter.    In other words, we have a hole in a theory that we have filled with something that cannot be seen or detected by any means.  We also have a detected gravitational anomaly in a group of formulas that predict various galactic motion.  We have neatly solved both problems by linking them to unknown and imaginary attributes of dark matter.   

Ah but math and observations, in this case, are not consistent because we do not see the same level of correlation between galactic rotation curve anomalies and the gravitational implications from galaxies that have a large visible light component.  We also do not see a uniform distribution of dark matter throughout space or even within galaxies.  The ratio of the detected gravitational anomalies attributed to dark matter does not seem to be consistent based on the quantity of stars in a galaxy.  

In fact, in globular clusters and galaxies such as NGC3379, there seems to be little or no dark matter at all and other galaxies have been discovered (VIRGOH121) that are almost entirely dark matter.   Another recent study showed that there are 10 to 100 times fewer small galaxies than predicted by the dark matter theory of galaxy formation.  We can’t even agree on whether there is any dark matter in our own Milky Way galaxy. 

So this imaginary solution has become a unifying concept among most astrophysicists but only if you keep allowing for a long list of inconsistencies and logical anomalies that get dismissed by saying that we don’t know what dark matter is. 

Fortunately, the flip side of cosmology is quantum physics and scientists in that field of study have not been satisfied with expressions of human ignorance and have tried to seek out a plausible answer.  Unfortunately, they have not had a lot of success when solution candidates are put under intense analysis.   Direct detection experiments such as DAMA/Nai and EGRET have mostly been discounted because they cannot be replicated (shades of Cold Fusion).  The neutrino was a candidate for awhile but has mostly been discounted because it moves too fast.  In fact, most relativistic (fast moving) particles cannot be used because they do not account for the clumps of dark matter observed.   Studies and logic have ruled out baryonic particles, electrons, protons, neutrons, neutrinos, WIMPs, and many others.

Up to this point, all this is historical fact and can be easily confirmed.  What we have is a typical scientific anomaly in which a lot of people really fear thinking outside the box.  The box of traditional and institutional thinking.  All of the particle solutions sought so far are simply looking at the heaviest or most massive particles known and asking if that could be dark matter. 

Despite the thinking that the dark matter itself is imaginary, why not expand the possibilities to some truly wild ideas?  What if there are black holes the size of atoms but with the gravitational pull of a pound of lead.  Would the solar wind of bright galaxies blow such small objects away from the galaxy center?  That would account for the reduced dark matter detected in high light-to-mass galaxies.  The math to show that this is possible can be applied to include or dismiss this idea very quickly and perhaps that has been done.  But there is an even better candidate.

Dark Matter and even Dark Energy can be accounted for by the presence of the Higgs Field and the Higgs Boson.   This takes the dark matter search out of the realm of finding an object or particle that exhibits unseen mass and puts it into the realm of being caused by the force of gravity itself. 

The Higgs field is a non-zero vacuum expectation value that permeates every place in the universe at all times and plays the role of giving mass to every elementary particle, including the Higgs boson itself.   If the detected gravitational anomalies are caused by changes in the source of mass itself, then a number of the problems and inconsistencies of dark matter are resolved.

The Higgs field can impart mass to other elementary particles and thus by extension to macro-matter that eventually create the observed massive gravitational fields around certain galaxies.  The variation of the effects of dark matter might simply be the non-homogeneous distribution of the Higgs field itself or on the particles that it acts upon.

This is somewhat supported by what we know that the Higgs field does to elementary particles.  For instance, the Top Quark is an elementary particle that is about the same size as the electron and yet it has over 200,000 times the mass of the electron as a result of the effects of the Higgs field.  We do not know why this occurs but it is firmly established that the Higgs field does NOT impart mass based on size, atomic weight, volume, spin or any other known characteristic of the fundamental particles that we currently know about.  It isn’t a big stretch of the imagination to think that there might be other kinds of interactions between the Higgs field and other matter that is not linear or homogeneous.

Some of the components of the Higgs field, specifically the Goldstone Bosons, are infraparticles which interact with soft photons which might account for the reduced dark matter detected in high light-to-mass galaxies.  I still like the idea that the high light-to-mass galaxies have a low dark matter component because of the solar wind blowing away the particles that the Higgs field acts on or in the thinning of the Higgs field itself.  What specific component of the “solar wind” that is responsible for this outward pressure or push is unknown but such an action does fit observations.

Since we have confirmed the existence of the Higgs boson and the Higgs field, it is perhaps possible to predict what kind of repulsive force it might impart but an extension of the scalar field theory for dark energy might imply applicable consequences for electroweak symmetry breaking in the early universe or some variation of the quintessence field theory.  What we call vacuum energy, the quintessence field, dark energy and the Higgs Field might actually be all variations of the same theme.  One interesting coincidence is that all of these have been speculated to have been created at about the same time period after the big bang event, i.e. very early on in the expansion phase.

The bottom line is that we have far too many reasonable and logical opportunities to explore alternative concepts to explain the gravitational anomalies of the virial theorem to galactic movements without resorting to the distraction of creating a terra incognita label for our lack of imagination and knowledge.

Accidental Weapon Discovery!

A New C-130 Prop leads to an incredible weapon of awesome power! I could get put in jail or worse for revealing this but someone has to stop them before they kill a lot of people.  I have to start from the beginning to make you understand how some very complex physics is now being developed as the worst weapon man has ever conceived.  It all started with a recent discovery by the NRL that has the military scientists scrambling to explain what they have seen.  Here is the whole story: The venerable C-130 is a time tested four-engine, turbo-prop aircraft design that we have simply not been able to improve upon.  It is rugged, can land on almost anything and carries tons of weight and has very long range.  Each new model upgrade has been given a new letter and we are now up to C-130V’s.  There is, however a new prototype being tested at NRL.  The soon-to-be C-130W was to have only two high efficiency, high torque, high-bypass turbo-prop engines using a new synchronized two bladed 21 foot long prop blade using a new fluid version of a variable ratio transmission (FVRT).  This two engine, two bladed prop would seem to be a throwback in design since one of the previous NRL C-130 prototypes used a ten bladed prop but this new blade is very special and in combination with the FVRT, was expected to be a better design The prop blade is very thin and light weight- only about 4 inches at its widest point – and spins at an incredible 45,000 RPM because the high torque engines are able to achieve incredible gear ratios with the FVRT.  The blade telescopes outward from the hub after takeoff to reach its full 21 feet without banging into the ground.  The inside of the blade has a cable that is controlled within the hub.  There is a thin carbon-fiber cable running down the center of the blade to hold it to the hub and to allow it to be extended and still flex as the speed increases.  At the tips and along the blade of the props are tiny electric circuits that send back data about speed, air, temperatures, humidity, air density, and other data that lets the computers tweak the blade shape and engine speeds.  The reason that all this is important will become clear shortly. The light weight, shape and design makes for a blade that can withstand the very high speeds and still function.  In fact, it is the blade that actually sets the peak speed of the prop, not the engine.  The mix of torque, FVRT and air density causes the blade to spin up to a maximum speed and then hold a constant speed for a given set of conditions.  As the air thins at high altitude, the prop spins faster but eventually it is suppose to reach a maximum speed – or so they thought – let me explain. 

As with most props, it does not move the aircraft by pushing air out the back like a jet but by pulling it forward using the forward horizontal “lift’ of the prop blade.  At slow speeds, the shorter blade twists to give a greater angle of attack to bite into more air but at its fully extended length and highest speeds, something different happens. At full speed, the fully extended tips of the blades are moving at 19 miles per second – that is more than 67,000 miles per hour or about 1.1% the speed of light.  It has long since passed Mach 1, in fact it is moving at 61 mach!  In actuality, Mach is meaningless at these speeds because if the plane is not moving very fast, the blade spins in a near vacuum.  The air does not have enough time to close in on the space where the blade was before the other blade spins into the same space.  In fact, the maximum blade speed was initially thought to be while it was on the ground and creating this near vacuum in which there was very little air density so the blade spun faster.  Then as it began to move faster after takeoff, the speed of the rotation actually slowed and then speeded up again. Once it is moving, the blade actually works better and better as the speed of the aircraft increases and so far they have not found a limit on how fast it will go.  They have taken a test C-130 up to just under Mach 1 but were afraid that its wings and large tail could not structurally withstand the turbulence of a trans-sonic flight.  Newer carbon-fiber swept wings are being developed and a new nose and tail The new engines, blade and transmission are really interesting but that is not the cause of all of the buzz.  What is causing a stir is the unusual speed the prop has attained in full speed flight.  The blade started going much faster than anyone had predicted.  In fact, in a test in 2002, as its speed passed 67,000 RPM, it was shut down manually by the pilot for fear of flying apart.  They have spent nearly two years trying to figure out why it is doing this. 

High speed rotation was the intent of the design all along so the bearings, shaft and hub strength and mounting are all very robust and were found to be safe up to 100,000 RPM in test-bed tests.  Simulated testing based on materials strength indicates that it should be safe up to 150,000 RPM but the entire airframe has not been tested to that level of vibration or speed. Recently, a special test bed flight platform was fixed to the nose of an old KC-135 (Boeing 707 jet airframe).  A specially designed blade was built with extra strength and mounted on a new engine with a FVRT.  The blade was made so it telescoped down in size until it was extended to its full length in flight.  This allowed the KC-135 to take off.   It also allowed for the testing of props longer than 21 feet. Once at an altitude of 55,000 ft – normally too high for most prop planes, the new prop and engine were started and gradually run up to maximum.  It passed 50,000 RPM within  a few minutes and continued to climb in speed for more than an hour.  The KC-135 increased in speed with the assist of the prop until the pilot shut off his four jet engines and let the aircraft be driven only by the one prop in the front.  The speed dropped initially but eventually was back to its former speed and accelerating – passing 500 knots within another hour.  High speed cameras were aimed at the prop from several angles on the KC-135’s wing and blade tip data was being recorded.  After flying more than 4 hours at over 500 knots and a steady increase in prop speeds, the pilot brought all the jet engines back online and spun down the prop and retracted it for landing. Upon examination of the cameras and blade tip data, they think they have discovered the reason for the over speed prop.  The end of the prop was slowly changing shape in a totally unexpected way.  More specifically, it appears to be bending and flowing backward as if it was trailing a ribbon behind the blade tip.  As the speed increases, the blade appears to get shorter and shorter while the part that trails behind gets longer and longer – as if it were bending backward. 

This visual evidence is counter to everything known of metal in the presence of this much centrifugal force.  The spinning blade should have such a huge force pulling outward due to the very high centrifugal forces, that nothing should be bending – especially at right angles to the prop and parallel to the line of flight.  Finally an explanation was found: The tip of the prop is traveling at over 1% of the speed of light and that gives it a different temporal (time) relationship to the rest of the aircraft.  Time slows down as you approach the speed of light so the top of the prop is actually in an earlier time than the rest of the aircraft.  Even at 1% of the speed of light, there is a measurable and visual difference.  I have not done the math but the Lorentz-Einstein math says that relativistic time stops at the speed of light so if we assume that we get 1% time-space distortion at 1% the speed of light, we can see and calculate the prop distortions. At 500 MPH, our analysis shows that the tips of the prop are moving at around 100,460 MPH in a circle and also moving forward at 733 feet per second.  If the very tip is actually not in the same time as the rest of the prop, and time is distorted by 1%, then it will appear to be about 7 feet (88 inches) behind (slower than) the rest of the prop.  In other words, what their high speed cameras showed was a prop that curved backward so that the very tip was stretched and bent back by 88 inches.  As the speed of the prop and the speed of the aircraft increased, the length of the curvature and the amount of the prop blade involved increased. What it was seeing is the same prop but as it appears slightly in the past and therefore slightly behind where the prop is now.  As more and more of the prop reached higher and higher speeds, it appears to be further and further behind giving the false impression that it is bending.  It isn’t actually bending, we are just seeing it where it was in a recent past time. 

But that is not all.  The extensive instrumentation of the test prop showed that it actually got easier to spin it as it went faster.  The outward centrifugal forces should make it appear that the prop is getting heavier but the instruments are showing that the prop is actually getting lighter in weight as it spins faster.  That is contrary to what was expected since the centrifugal forces should have increased its apparent weight but measurements don’t reflect that.  An extensive study has revealed why.   Relative to the measurements taken in the present time – relative to the aircraft – there is a portion of the prop blade that is effectively missing because it is spinning in a different time!  The tip is effectively not there NOW because it has moved into an earlier time.  Since it is effectively missing as far as the measurements of present time torque, air resistance, friction, momentum, inertia and centrifugal forces, the engine can spin the remaining part of the prop blade easier.  But, as the engine sees less load, it can spin faster for the same amount of fuel and as it goes faster, more of the blade moves into the past.  Essentially, as the prop speeds up, more and more of the prop is moving into an earlier and earlier time – so the prop continues to go faster and faster. But now it gets really weird.  Since the Lorentz-Einstein math says that relativistic space-time effects are a constant and applies to everything, the guys at NRL hooked up a laser to the hub so that it pointed directly at a very tiny reflector attached at the very end of the prop.  The idea was to use this laser to measure the length distortions of the prop as a result of the centrifugal forces and to a lesser extent to measure the flex distortions.  Because of the dual carbon fiber cables inside the blade and the carbon fiber blade shell, it was not expected to show much distortion – and it didn’t…or rather not in the way they thought it would. Despite the visual distortion of the shape of the blade as shown in the high speed cameras and explained above, the laser showed that the blade was still straight with no bend or distortion.  This confirmed the idea that it was not actually changing shape but was changing time.  In a few frames of the camera shots, higher humidity made the beam visible and it showed that the laser beam bent in exactly the same way that the metal prop did.  The laser beam curved backward and remained exactly parallel along the apparently bent prop blade.  

Quite by accident, one of the reflectors broke off and the laser beam extended passed the end of the prop – out into the air but the cameras showed that it continued to bend until it disappeared completely.  At the time, this was seen as a curiosity so a much more powerful laser was installed and the cameras were re-pointed and the experiment repeated.  This time the clearly visible beam curved back until they were parallel to the flight path and then at about 4200 feet out, it just disappeared.  At that point, it was so far in the past that it effectively was not of this time and could not be photographed. Observable evidence was limited at this point so some of the findings were a function of calculations.  The laser light was increased in power to try to create a more visible beam.  Theoretically, this beam extended well beyond the prop by miles – when stopped, it was measured to be still strong and visible as much as 30 miles from the aircraft.  At the speed of rotation of 50,000 RPM, the laser light at 30 miles was moving at 84.45% of the speed of light meaning that the light beam was experiencing an 84% distortion of the space-time continuum – making the beam change a number of its propagation properties. The accepted theory of science is that light is made up of both waves (like the frequency of the colors of the spectrum) and particles  (photons which have no mass – or so we thought).  The laser light was a single frequency light from a tunable distributed feedback fiber laser having both thermal and piezoelectric control elements giving a single frequency, wavelength and intensity.  Using such a beam of uniform, intensity, high spatial purity and high conversion efficiency, we were able to use the light as a benchmark measure for precise spectrual analysis.  What we expected was minor nano-level changes but what happened was beyond anyting we had imagined. The time distortion created a cone shaped vortex that extended back from the plane in both space and time – effectively blanketing the entire countryside with a virtually continuous flood of coverage from the beam.  The Doppler shift effect on the frequency of the laser light from of the rotating beam altered the signal over the full range of rotation speeds from the hub to the outter most limits of the beam – dispersing a beam of mixed frequencies that went from its broadcast light frequency up to frequencies of cosmic particle frequencies.  The trailing edge of the blade was also emitting the light beam signal but the Doppler effect caused the shift to go down in frequency from its broadcast light frequency down thru all radio frequencies down to ripples in induced direct current.  Essentially this cone shaped beam was making a powerful sonic boom kind of coverage but instead of sound, the landscape was bathed in electro-magnetic frequency (EMF) spectrum radio waves and light of virtually every frequency spectrum from DC to light frequencies and beyond.   

It was quite by accident that we discovered that some of the emissions were in the X-ray and gamma ray range (measured using Compton scattering) and that the ionizing frequencies were having an affect on almost everything.  Upon exploring this further, we could not measure the shortest and longest wavelenght with the equipment we had.  After some calculations, we estimated that we were creating frequencies in the vicinity of the Planck length.  In other words, we were artificially creating the light radiation frequencies that normally exist within and between atomic particles.  We could measure down to around 10 picometers but it was obvious that there was something else there.  The energy needed for these intense particles would normally be in the range of 100 keV but we were seeing them being created by this cone of EMF without the benefit of a massive accelerator. The effects of the pass-over of all of these frequencies was startling.  Since there are harmonic frequencies for virtually everything in existence and this plane was putting out every known frequency from DC to gamma rays and beyond, the destructive harmonic frequency of thousands, perhaps millions of objects was reached.  In addition, the super high frequency of the high end, leading edge (compressed) wave front was bombarding everything with intense high energy ionizing EMF radiation that has only rarely been seen in events like electron-positron annihilation and radioactive decay – on the order of 10-20 Sv (Sieverts)!  After the fly over (mostly in the Nevada desert north of Las Vegas), the ground under the flight path was found to not contain any hard rocks or crystals.  Only sandstone and sedimentary rocks.  Anything that was hard or crystalline was shattered into smaller pieces – dust that was finer than sand – more like talcum powder.  Compounds were broken into their component atomic parts and atomic bonding was being destroyed within molecules.  Anything that could flex, bend or absorb the intense vibrations was mostly unaffected but even most of the plants were wilted and limp.  Those items that were hard, broke apart.  The weak signal, large area dispersal and the very short duration of exposure is the only thing that kept everything from sand to mountains from crumbling.   Several military ground vehicles were in the area and were totally immobilized.  The steel in their vehicles was instantly weakened to the point of falling apart.  “It had the consistency and strength of a Ritz cracker” – said one of the workers.  Even the man’s diamond ring turned to fine shiny dust.  The men were seriously injured by what appeared like massive bleeding but they are keeping all that very secret.  We, in the electronics room, suspect they were reacting to the massive dose of radiation in the X-ray and gamma rate region.  I don’t even want to think about what happened to their teeth and bones.   Now NRL is discussing how to control the beam and its effects but are struggling with the relativistic effects of the time-space distortions and the control of the laser beam. I hope you will take this seriously.  I could get in a lot of trouble for posting this.  If you doubt any of this, check it out.  Do the math.  Read the Lorentz-Einstein math or Doppler and the aerodynamics of prop blades.  The FVRT is not commercially available yet but will be soon.  The two bladed prop is still hush hush but can be found in dozens of aerodynamics books.  What is dangerous is that this plane, using this beam and prop as a weapon could be made to increase the beam power and destroy everything  under it and either side of it for miles – rocks, glass, buildings, people – turning everything into a fine powdery dust or an oozing mass of jelly. We have enough weapons and this is one that kills and destroys everything.  I can only hope tht by letting people know what is happening, we can stop more deaths.